The Katz Effect !

[colonel]

I thought I would show a before and after screenshot after being approved for submissions to katz....

Our traffic before Katz:

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9508/beforekatztrafficcc0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/beforekatztrafficcc0.jpg/1/w1239.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img220/beforekatztrafficcc0.jpg/1/)

Our traffic after one day of our submissions being approved to Katz:

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/6606/afterkatztrafficuh2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/afterkatztrafficuh2.jpg/1/w1250.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img227/afterkatztrafficuh2.jpg/1/)

Heheheeh....what a difference ;)

[Cuddles]

WOW that is allot of people for sure.

[colonel]

You are telling me ! In one day, Katz has basically doubled the amount of traffic that we had received in two weeks !!!

[carnage]

ay what site is that ? were it shows ur site stats i wanna see my sites stats :)

[colonel]

Awstats mate....just install it on your server...if it is not installed already ;)

If you have cpanel, it should be installed.

[KaiTrac]

What is that link to get statistics?

[colonel]

It depends on where the script is installed mate...

The default is:

http://***.com:2082/awstats.pl?config=***.com&ssl=&lang=en

*** is your domain name.

[colonel]

I have a dedi server....however, here is the install tut if you have vps/vds or a dedi:

http://w3.z-add.co.uk/article/articleview/162/1/27/

You must have root access...if you have a shared hosting account, then the host must install it for you.

[KaiTrac]

That is useless to me.

Thanks anyway. Good stats. Katz rules!

[lifetalk]

Lol.. compared to mine.. these stats are nothing.

I don't have current screenshots, however, in about 14 days, Katz brought in about 8 million or so hits ;)

[carnage]

lifetalk... right..... thats like redirecting google to ur site... lmfao

[colonel]

Hahahahaha...lmfao ! He must have a server farm with its own gigabit backbone in its own DC to support that much traffic !

[Phatal]

Lol.. compared to mine.. these stats are nothing.

I don't have current screenshots, however, in about 14 days, Katz brought in about 8 million or so hits ;)

That's a lie. your site isn't even a 5 star and you getting 8 million hits every 14 days.

[lifetalk]

My site.. happens to be a 4 star site. And to be honest with you, I suggest you check out with other warez website owners... apparently, 8million hits is not a huge bandwith hog..

I'll be putting up traffic proof soon ;)

EDIT: Here is last month's screenshot.. I started monitoring traffic on 14th Oct..
http://www.ipichost.info/0E30_490ACEE4.jpg

This month has been explosive (because I just started submitting to ******** too)

[MRDJ]

http://www.imageurlhost.com/images/6wq3nn0j33i8ot30b3j.jpg

ya well hes right id doesnt take that much of B/w...


@lifetalk how many hits u geting from phaze these days...

[Phatal]

Well I made a mistake, I thought you meant visits. In that point I have a lot more hits then you.

[lifetalk]

I said hits... means.. hits :)

[colonel]

I thought you meant UV's as well !

Besides, you are comparing a month of traffic ! I was only stating my stats for two days !!!

[lifetalk]

Actually, if you can see the stats, my traffic monitoring started 16th October ;)

And no.. it's HITs.. not UV's :)

But .. I don't really care about this discussion anymore.. I am a part of that board, but not the owner anymore.. I sold it a few weeks back :)

[Cøbra]

LOL. You do realise that "hits" are misleading ?

Server-side statistics count every file served as a "hit", be it a webpage, an image or any other type of file.

So if your webpage has 100 images, that'd be 1 hit for the webpage + 100 hits for each image = 101 hits.

You should be counting visits, not hits.

[colonel]

Exactly, hits are also gained by repetitive IP GET requests to the destination server....very misleading...

UV's are what everyone should be looking for.

[Th3obr0]

Exactly, hits are also gained by repetitive IP GET requests to the destination server....very misleading...

UV's are what everyone should be looking for.

Unique Visitors are the one that bring up a site's rating ;).

[lifetalk]

LOL. You do realise that "hits" are misleading ?

Server-side statistics count every file served as a "hit", be it a webpage, an image or any other type of file.

So if your webpage has 100 images, that'd be 1 hit for the webpage + 100 hits for each image = 101 hits.

You should be counting visits, not hits.

Yes I do :)
I am perfectly aware of what HITS are .. and how they are counted. But then, I was merely comparing to what the OP mentioned.

Now.. If the rest of you are done with the theories,.. can we move on? :)

[colonel]

lol....it makes for an interesting thread ;)

[ryanzilla244]

Thats awsome.