URL Masking

[DEZi]

Hi Let me Introduce myself I am the Admin of www.dezibeatz.com
and have been submitting downloads to katz for some time now.

Yesterday it came to my notice that Katz has introduced a new rule ie. :

19 URL masking and timed redirection services containing advertising are not allowed.
(Eg: *********.net, *********.de, *************, rsprotect.com, dlurl.net, rapidleecher.com, etc.)

I used *********** in two of my submissions i think (and both didn't get accepted either)
Anyways the main reason i used *********** was for the longevity of the download links

I think you are advising not to use
*********.net, *********.de, *************, rsprotect.com, dlurl.net, rapidleecher.com
because they are showing bad ads and all which is not acceptable by katz right.

I think *********** doesn't have such ads (correct me if i am wrong.)

So could i use *********** or should i refrain from using *********** :| ?

[funx]

yes they do

example: http://***********/?id=fiem781gdg5khq58hwclmcchzf44ud

you may not use short url sites which use ads, even text ads

it must redirect directly to the dl page

[Cøbra]

*********.net, *********.de, *************, rsprotect.com, dlurl.net, rapidleecher.comAnything where the user cannot see the actual URLs of the downloads is considered URL masking. The above is not a definitive list, but rather just examples.

[DEZi]

*********.net, *********.de, *************, rsprotect.com, dlurl.net, rapidleecher.comAnything where the user cannot see the actual URLs of the downloads is considered URL masking. The above is not a definitive list, but rather just examples.

I See Ok I will not use URL Masking then :)

[funx]

well look at isocopyworld.com, its short ur urls, but no time redirection, no ads, 100% clean, some sites have used it and didnt got banned, becuase of direct redirect